Skip to main content

Bible Blog: Reading Bible Discourse

There are three basic types of literature in the Bible: narrative, poetry, and discourse, and each type communicates in a different way. In April we talked about reading Bible stories, and last month we talked about poetry.; this week we’re talking about the last genre: discourse.
What is “discourse?” Basically, discourse is any passage of scripture that lays out logical reasoning for why we should behave a certain way. Think of the Law of Moses, the Wisdom books, the Sermon on the Mount, or the New Testament Letters. Discourse is what we are used to reading, because it’s often simple and easy to break down into short statements. “Do not murder.” “Blessed are the peacemakers.” “You shall love the Lord your God will all your heart, soul and mind.” These are short, simple, and easy to apply. This is how we want the whole Bible to be.
The truth is, however, that even in discourse things are not quite so simple. There are several factors we have to keep in mind while we are reading, in order to take away the right meaning of the passage. Take, for instance, Jeremiah 29:11: “‘For I know the plans I have for you,’ declares the Lord, ‘plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future.’” This passage appears on countless graduation cards, bible bags, and other products with the basic message: everything is going to go well for you because God has a plan for your life. But is that what this verse means? Let’s take a look:

  1. Who is speaking? You can see in the verse that God is speaking. More specifically, God is speaking through his prophet Jeremiah. Now, of course all of Scripture is God’s word, but God isn’t always the one speaking. For instance, I once saw verse-a-day calendar that used Luke 4:7, “If you worship me, it will all be yours,” as an encouraging verse. The problem is, Luke 4 is the story of the Temptation of Jesus, and the character speaking in verse 7 is the Devil. Clearly the makers of that calendar were not paying attention to who was speaking. In the case of Jeremiah 29:11, however, we’re on solid ground.
  2. Who are they speaking to? Now this is important. Jeremiah 29 is a letter written by Jeremiah to a specific group of people—the first group of Jews who were taken into exile in 597 BC. Jeremiah was not writing to all of God’s people across time and space, but to a specific group of people in a specific time. We cannot assume that everything said in the Bible is said to us. This is especially important when we are reading the Old Testament, which is addressed to God’s covenant people Israel. This doesn’t mean that we can’t learn from the Old Testament, far from it. But we do have to remember that they had a special covenant with God—a different covenant than God has with the Church.
  3. Where does this take place in the story of the Bible? Jeremiah 29 takes place at a very important stage in the story of the Bible: at the breaking of the Covenant. God had entered into a special contract with Israel: they would follow his law and he would be their God. After centuries of Israel breaking the Covenant, God finally invoked the punishment clause of their contract by sending them into exile. Jeremiah is writing to the exiles to help them understand that God is the one who sent them into exile—God actually wants them in Babylon. And that leads us to the final insight.
  4. What is their main point? Here is where our normal use of Jeremiah 29:11 breaks down. If you read the whole letter, you find that Jeremiah is making a very different point than you would expect from all the graduation cards. Go read the whole chapter. When you read this verse in its proper context, you realize that “you” is plural. God is talking to a whole nation, not a single person. His plans will prosper Israel, and he offers hope for Israel. That means the people who received this letter were getting good news and bad news. Sure, God had plans and hope for Israel—but only after their generation had died in exile. He was telling them to settle down in Babylon because they wouldn’t be coming back—their kids would. The point of this verse is not to tell God’s people that each of their lives are going to go well. The point of this passage is to tell God’s people that, even though our individual lives may not go well, God’s purposes continue and he will fulfill his plan for the people of God. This is why it’s important to track with the author’s overall argument, not just a specific verse. Many Christians have gotten very wrong notions from the Bible by taking verses out of context and ignoring the main point.

I believe that one of the worst things we can do with Scripture is take it lightly. “The Bible says it, and I believe it!” is a great motto, as long as we understand that figuring out “what the Bible says” requires thought, prayer, and discipline. We can’t just assume that the interpretation that seems most obvious to us is the correct one. After all, the people who wrote the Bible wrote in ancient languages to ancient audiences in ancient cultures. We can understand the Bible—and the most important parts, what we might call the “essentials,” are very clear. Humanity is sinful, God sent his son to die for our sins, and through faith in him we can be saved. These are undeniable truths of Scripture. But as we move out into areas that are less clear, we ought to be careful how we proceed. We must be humble and recognize that our interpretations of Scripture are fallible, and we must remember that faithful Christians can disagree on the proper way to interpret Scripture. And we must accept our brothers and sisters in Christ, even when we disagree.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Massacre of the Innocents [By W.H. Auden]

[From For the Time Being,  by W.H. Auden] HEROD One needn’t be much of a psychologist to realize that if this rumor is not stamped out now, in a few years it is capable of diseasing the whole Empire, and one doesn’t have to be a prophet to predict the consequences if it should. Reason will be replaced by Revelation. Instead of Rational Law, objective truths perceptible to any who will undergo the necessary intellectual discipline, and the same for all, Knowledge will degenerate into a riot of subjective visions—feelings in the solar plexus induced by undernourishment, angelic images generated by fevers or drugs, dream warnings inspired by the sound of falling water. Whole cosmologies will be created out of some forgotten personal resentment, complete epics written in private languages, the daubs of school children ranked above the great masterpieces. Idealism will be replaced by Materialism. Priapus will only have to move to a good address and call himself Eros

Works of Love XVIII: “Love for the Dead”

[From Part II, Chapter IX: “ The Work of Love in Remembering One Dead ”] “Weep less bitterly for the dead, for he is at rest.” Sirach 22:11 (NRSV) [1] With chapter 9 of part 2, Works of Love is beginning to come to a close. With entry 17, this blog series is also nearing its end. As Kierkegaard has given us a detailed view of what Christian love is supposed to look like, now he gives us a way to test the purity of our own love: look at the way you love those who have died. [2] We are to love everyone, and loving means remembering, and so we are to love the dead. But loving those who have died is a special circumstance, and it shows us what kind of love we are showing. If we reflect on the way we love the dead, we can see whether we are showing truly Christian love. Kierkegaard identifies three ways that love for the dead is unique. First, he says that showing love for the dead is “a work of the most unselfish love.” He writes, “If one wants to make sure that love is

The Temptation of St. Joseph [By W.H. Auden]

[From For the Time Being  by W.H. Auden, about the experience of Joseph after hearing that Mary is pregnant.]           JOSEPH My shoes were shined, my pants were cleaned and pressed, And I was hurrying to meet           My own true Love: But a great crowd grew and grew Till I could not push my way through           Because A star had fallen down in the street;           When they saw who I was, The police tried to do their best.