Skip to main content

Bible Blog: Reading Bible Stories

The Bible is not one book; it’s an entire library. And in that library, there are many different types of books: history, biography, poetry, music, philosophy, novel, letters—the list goes on. When reading the Bible, it’s very important to understand the type of material you are reading so you can interpret it properly. For our purposes, we’re going to divide the Bible into three types: narrative (stories), poetry, and discourse. This month I want to focus on narrative: how do we read Bible stories?
Narrative is the biggest category of Biblical material: it makes up 43% of the Bible. The majority of Biblical stories are found in the Old Testament History books (Genesis through Esther) and the Gospels (Matthew-Acts). In my opinion, the key to properly interpreting Bible stories is: remember that Bible stories are history, not fables. They tell us what really happened, warts and all. If you keep this in mind, it will help you avoid two common pitfalls:

1. Do not assume that you are supposed to copy the behavior of Bible characters. 

The Bible gives us a historical account of flawed people, often without passing judgment on their actions. You cannot assume that characters in the Bible are doing the right thing. For instance, was Gideon right to ask for a sign from God (Judges 6)? Was Jephthah right to sacrifice his daughter to God (Judges 11)? Was Ezra right to order the Jews to divorce their wives (Ezra 9-10)? The Bible doesn’t say whether they were right; it just tells us what they did.

2. Do not assume that every story is there to show you the “rules” of how God works. 

The Bible shows us that God is consistent, but he does make exceptions—and he doesn’t always tell us what those exceptions are. Take, for instance, the thief on the cross. If you talk about what is required for salvation long enough, someone will eventually bring up the thief on the cross to prove that you don’t need to do anything but confess faith in Jesus in order to be saved. There are two problems with this argument: number 1, the Bible does not tell us whether that story shows us the rule, or Jesus was making an exception (the story does take place under exceptional circumstances). Number 2, the thief on the cross doesn’t confess faith in Jesus. All he does is rebuke the other thief and ask Jesus to remember him in his kingdom. That makes the thief an exception to everyone’s interpretation of the plan of salvation. Perhaps we have the story of the thief because it’s a meaningful historical event, not because it teaches us a doctrine of salvation.

3. Don’t expect Bible stories to spoon-feed you the answers. 

The purpose of the Bible is to point us toward Jesus. We do not worship a book, we worship the God that book tells us about. The purpose of Bible stories is not to spoon-feed you the answers the way Aesop’s fables do. Their purpose is to introduce you to God by telling you the history of his relationship with human beings. If you remember, last month I said that the purpose of the Bible is meditation. By thinking about these stories, by chewing on them, talking about them, wrestling with the parts we don’t understand, we meditate on the word. You may never come to a satisfying answer about whether Jephthah was right to kill his daughter—but the wrestling, the struggle will drive you closer to God. And ultimately, it is God who satisfies, not the Bible.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Massacre of the Innocents [By W.H. Auden]

[From For the Time Being,  by W.H. Auden] HEROD One needn’t be much of a psychologist to realize that if this rumor is not stamped out now, in a few years it is capable of diseasing the whole Empire, and one doesn’t have to be a prophet to predict the consequences if it should. Reason will be replaced by Revelation. Instead of Rational Law, objective truths perceptible to any who will undergo the necessary intellectual discipline, and the same for all, Knowledge will degenerate into a riot of subjective visions—feelings in the solar plexus induced by undernourishment, angelic images generated by fevers or drugs, dream warnings inspired by the sound of falling water. Whole cosmologies will be created out of some forgotten personal resentment, complete epics written in private languages, the daubs of school children ranked above the great masterpieces. Idealism will be replaced by Materialism. Priapus will only have to move to a good address and call himself Eros
Post a Comment
Read more

Works of Love XVIII: “Love for the Dead”

[From Part II, Chapter IX: “ The Work of Love in Remembering One Dead ”] “Weep less bitterly for the dead, for he is at rest.” Sirach 22:11 (NRSV) [1] With chapter 9 of part 2, Works of Love is beginning to come to a close. With entry 17, this blog series is also nearing its end. As Kierkegaard has given us a detailed view of what Christian love is supposed to look like, now he gives us a way to test the purity of our own love: look at the way you love those who have died. [2] We are to love everyone, and loving means remembering, and so we are to love the dead. But loving those who have died is a special circumstance, and it shows us what kind of love we are showing. If we reflect on the way we love the dead, we can see whether we are showing truly Christian love. Kierkegaard identifies three ways that love for the dead is unique. First, he says that showing love for the dead is “a work of the most unselfish love.” He writes, “If one wants to make sure that love is
Post a Comment
Read more

The Temptation of St. Joseph [By W.H. Auden]

[From For the Time Being  by W.H. Auden, about the experience of Joseph after hearing that Mary is pregnant.]           JOSEPH My shoes were shined, my pants were cleaned and pressed, And I was hurrying to meet           My own true Love: But a great crowd grew and grew Till I could not push my way through           Because A star had fallen down in the street;           When they saw who I was, The police tried to do their best.
Post a Comment
Read more