Skip to main content

Works of Love VI: Love Fulfills the Law

[From Part I Chapter III.A, "Love is the Fulfilling of the Law"]

Love does no wrong to a neighbor; therefore love is the fulfilling of the law. 
~Romans 13:10, ESV

 “Christian love… is sheer action…. It never becomes engrossed in anything beforehand and never gives a promise in place of action. It never draws satisfaction from imagining that it has finished. It never loiters delighting in itself; it never sits idly marveling at itself. It is not that secret, private, mysterious feeling behind the lattice of the inexplicable, which the poet wants to lure to the window, not a soul-mood which fondly knows no laws, wants to know none, or wants to have its own law and harkens only to singing—it is pure action and its every deed is holy, for it is the fulfilling of the law.”[1]

We do not tend to think of love and law together. Evangelical and Secular society each have their own reason for this—in Evangelical culture, the law represents cold, rigid expectations, dead religiosity which runs counter to Gospel. In Secular ethics, placing requirements or expectations on another person’s behavior or character is perhaps the worst of the cardinal sins. And yet Paul tells us that love is the fulfillment of the law. After all, don’t the Law of Moses and the Grace of Jesus Christ issue from the same God? How do we reconcile the requirements of the law with Christian Love? How can we say that love fulfills the law?
For Kierkegaard the answer is in the person of Jesus Christ. He continues,

“[Christ] was love, and his love was the fulfilling of the law. ‘No one could convict him of any sin,’ not even the law, which knows everything in the conscience. [H]was one with the Father, one with every single demand of the law, so that fulfilling it was a need, his only life-necessity.—Love in him was pure action.”[2]
Christ is the only human being to have lived his life according to the law. See, our view of the law is skewed by the fact that we are all breakers of the law. We can’t understand what the law is for. But in Christ we can see the law lived out in history. For Kierkegaard, this observation is key:
 “Christ was the fulfilling of the law. From him we should learn how to understand this thought, for he was the explanation. Only when the explanation is what it explains, when the one who explains is that which is explained, when the explanation is the transfiguration, only then is there the right relationship.”[3]
God gave us the law to teach us to live in love. And yet the law is not sufficient for this purpose, because no number of laws can compel a person to love others. I can follow every law to the letter and still have no love in my life. No matter how many laws God gives us, we can never understand love simply by adding up the laws. Kierkegaard writes,
 “You will see it is useless labor, because the concept of the law is inexhaustible, endless, and unlimited in its provisions; every provision brings forth a still more exact explication of itself, and then again by reference and relation to the new provision a still more exacting provision, and so on ad infinitum. The relation of love to the law is like the relation of understanding to faith. The understanding reckons and reckons, calculates and calculates, but it never attains the certainty which faith has. So it is with the law: it defines and defines, but never reaches the sum, which is love.”
Christ came because the law was insufficient. By looking at the life Christ lived we can see what love is really supposed to look at—what the law was meant to teach us the entire time. This is how love fulfills the law: because the purpose of the law was to show us what loving actions look like. To actually show love for its own sake, and not for the sake of the law, is a higher calling. When we see Christ we understand that it is not enough to follow the requirements of the law; rather, we must live out the demands of love.
What is the point of all this reflection? Simply this: that Christian love is not easier than the law. Christ did not lower the requirement placed on us. In fact, he increased them. This is why Christ said that anger is as bad as murder, and lust as bad as adultery—he was showing us that love has a higher standard even than the law. It is a higher calling, not a lower calling. The law was always trying to point up, toward this higher standard. When Christ lived his life according to that higher standard, he left us each without excuse. To live by love is not to do less than the law, but to do more.

Dear God,
I confess that I like the law. I like to have a specific set of requirements that I can check off, so that when I’m done I know where I stand. I also like having grace, when that means that I don’t have to worry about checking anything off the list. And yet neither of these is what you offer. You offer me grace that forgives all of my transgressions, but you offer that grace so that I may pick myself up and live from now on according to your love. I confess that I often do not want to live that way. Please, convict me of that feeling. Push me on, give me a desire for your sanctification. Make me discontent with anything less than a life of love, and give me your power to strive for that high standard.
In the name of your Son, the one who lived such a life of love and died so that I may have it to,
Amen.






[1] Søren Kierkegaard, Works of Love. Translated by Howard V. and Edna H Hong. Princeton University Press, 1995,  105-6. Emphasis in original.
[2] Ibid
[3] Ibid 109

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Massacre of the Innocents [By W.H. Auden]

[From For the Time Being,  by W.H. Auden] HEROD One needn’t be much of a psychologist to realize that if this rumor is not stamped out now, in a few years it is capable of diseasing the whole Empire, and one doesn’t have to be a prophet to predict the consequences if it should. Reason will be replaced by Revelation. Instead of Rational Law, objective truths perceptible to any who will undergo the necessary intellectual discipline, and the same for all, Knowledge will degenerate into a riot of subjective visions—feelings in the solar plexus induced by undernourishment, angelic images generated by fevers or drugs, dream warnings inspired by the sound of falling water. Whole cosmologies will be created out of some forgotten personal resentment, complete epics written in private languages, the daubs of school children ranked above the great masterpieces. Idealism will be replaced by Materialism. Priapus will only have to move to a good address and call himself Eros

Works of Love XVIII: “Love for the Dead”

[From Part II, Chapter IX: “ The Work of Love in Remembering One Dead ”] “Weep less bitterly for the dead, for he is at rest.” Sirach 22:11 (NRSV) [1] With chapter 9 of part 2, Works of Love is beginning to come to a close. With entry 17, this blog series is also nearing its end. As Kierkegaard has given us a detailed view of what Christian love is supposed to look like, now he gives us a way to test the purity of our own love: look at the way you love those who have died. [2] We are to love everyone, and loving means remembering, and so we are to love the dead. But loving those who have died is a special circumstance, and it shows us what kind of love we are showing. If we reflect on the way we love the dead, we can see whether we are showing truly Christian love. Kierkegaard identifies three ways that love for the dead is unique. First, he says that showing love for the dead is “a work of the most unselfish love.” He writes, “If one wants to make sure that love is

The Temptation of St. Joseph [By W.H. Auden]

[From For the Time Being  by W.H. Auden, about the experience of Joseph after hearing that Mary is pregnant.]           JOSEPH My shoes were shined, my pants were cleaned and pressed, And I was hurrying to meet           My own true Love: But a great crowd grew and grew Till I could not push my way through           Because A star had fallen down in the street;           When they saw who I was, The police tried to do their best.