Skip to main content

Bible Blog: Is the Bible Simple?



Reading the Bible is simple, isn’t it? “The Bible says it, I believe it.” It’s a simple as that, isn’t it? Of course, if it is that simple, then why are there so many interpretations of the Bible? And not just small disagreements, but perspectives that are completely opposite of each other? The founders of the Christian Church movement believed that the Bible is accessible to each and every Christian, not just pastors or scholars—and I agree whole-heartedly. But just because the Bible is accessible to everyone does not mean that the Bible is simple. In fact, I believe that many of the theological problems we get into come from the fact that we assume the Bible is simple and easy to read. In reality, there are several obstacles that we have to hurdle in order to understand the Bible:

  1. Language: Quick: can you recite Genesis 1:1? If you started with “For God so loved the world…” then you’re… wrong! Well, in a way. That’s an English translation of John 3:16. The actual test of John 3:16 is in the box to the right. Did you know that the words translated as “eternal life” actually mean “life of the age?” To John, the important thing about the life Jesus brings is that it is a new kind, the kind of life from the future age. But you can’t see that in (most) English translations. Whenever you read a Bible, you are reading just one of 60+ English translations of what the Bible says. 
  2. Genre: The Bible is not just one book; it is an entire library of books from different times, written by different people, in different styles, for different reasons. It contains history, law, poetry, philosophy, music, novels, biographies, letters, apocalypses, and prophecy—each of which need to be read differently from each other. If you try to pull statements of fact out of poetry, you’re going to badly misread the text. If you try to read apocalypse the same way you read history, you will totally miss the point.  And people do make that mistake—all the time. 
  3. Context: The Bible was written between two and four thousand years ago, on different continents, in a different hemisphere, in vastly different cultures. The people who wrote the Bible thought in different ways than we do, and they had different questions than we did. If you assume that they think the way you do, you will miss the point. The first Reformers made this mistake. They assumed that the 1st-century Jews acted just like the 15th-century Catholics, so when Paul talks about “works of the law,” he must be talking about earning your way to Heaven with good deeds. But the Jews weren’t worried about “getting into Heaven” by doing “good deeds.” They were thinking about being part of God’s nation through initiation rituals like circumcision. Paul wasn’t talking about works righteousness. He’s arguing against the idea that you have to be Jew to be a Christian. 

There are several other obstacles that we face when we read the Bible, but my point is this: the Bible should never be taken lightly. The Bible is accessible to every person, no matter their background or education, and the essentials of the Gospel are clear. But when we start turning the Bible into doctrines, like “The Bible says that tattoos are wrong” (It doesn’t; there’s a context issue) or “The Bible says homosexuality is wrong” (it does, undeniably) we need to be very careful and make sure that we are doing our homework. Like my Seminary advisor once said, “The Bible is as sharp as a double-edged sword. Use it like a scalpel, not a switchblade.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Massacre of the Innocents [By W.H. Auden]

[From For the Time Being,  by W.H. Auden] HEROD One needn’t be much of a psychologist to realize that if this rumor is not stamped out now, in a few years it is capable of diseasing the whole Empire, and one doesn’t have to be a prophet to predict the consequences if it should. Reason will be replaced by Revelation. Instead of Rational Law, objective truths perceptible to any who will undergo the necessary intellectual discipline, and the same for all, Knowledge will degenerate into a riot of subjective visions—feelings in the solar plexus induced by undernourishment, angelic images generated by fevers or drugs, dream warnings inspired by the sound of falling water. Whole cosmologies will be created out of some forgotten personal resentment, complete epics written in private languages, the daubs of school children ranked above the great masterpieces. Idealism will be replaced by Materialism. Priapus will only have to move to a good address and call himself Eros

Works of Love XVIII: “Love for the Dead”

[From Part II, Chapter IX: “ The Work of Love in Remembering One Dead ”] “Weep less bitterly for the dead, for he is at rest.” Sirach 22:11 (NRSV) [1] With chapter 9 of part 2, Works of Love is beginning to come to a close. With entry 17, this blog series is also nearing its end. As Kierkegaard has given us a detailed view of what Christian love is supposed to look like, now he gives us a way to test the purity of our own love: look at the way you love those who have died. [2] We are to love everyone, and loving means remembering, and so we are to love the dead. But loving those who have died is a special circumstance, and it shows us what kind of love we are showing. If we reflect on the way we love the dead, we can see whether we are showing truly Christian love. Kierkegaard identifies three ways that love for the dead is unique. First, he says that showing love for the dead is “a work of the most unselfish love.” He writes, “If one wants to make sure that love is

Choruses from the Rock (VI), By T.S. Eliot

[I know that I promised blog entries that I haven't delivered yet. I've got plenty of ideas in my head, it's just a matter of finding the time and the motivation at the same time. Anyway, I expect that I'll be ready to write relatively soon, but until then I thought I would tide you over with a section from T.S. Eliot's excellent poem, Choruses from "The Rock". Enjoy!] It is hard for those who have never known persecution, And who have never known a Christian, To believe these tales of Christian persecution. It is hard for those who live near a Bank To doubt the security of their money. It is hard for those who live near a Police Station To believe in the triumph of violence. Do you think that the Faith has conquered the World And that lions no longer need keepers? Do you need to be told that whatever has been, can still be? Do you need to be told that even such modest attainments As you boast of in the way of polite society Will hardly surv