Skip to main content

Bible Blog: Four Ways to Read the Bible

Christians should read the Bible. We all know this, right? And yet, if you’re like me, you often struggle to make it a regular habit. Why is that? Why do we have such a hard time reading the Bible? If you’re like me, you start to feel guilty. Maybe I don’t love God enough. Maybe I’m not sincere enough in my faith. Maybe I’m drifting away from God….

Maybe. But maybe not. I find that there are several practical obstacles that get in the way of reading the Bible, and they have nothing to do with how sincere my faith is. Sometimes I read the Bible the wrong way for what I’m trying to accomplish; sometimes I don’t pay attention to the genre of the book I’m reading; sometimes I’ve lost sight of where I am in the overall story of the Bible. There are plenty of practical obstacles that get in my way, but this month I want to focus on the first one: reading the Bible in the wrong way.

I find that there are (at least) four ways to read the Bible:

  1. Reading: approach the Bible like you would a novel. Read it in big chunks: whole stories or whole letters in one go. Focus on overarching plot and themes. Get a wide-angle view of scripture. Don’t worry about breaking down each verse.
  2. Public Reading: do the same as above, but listen to the Bible being read aloud. Use an audio book, a Bible app, or a reading partner. Listening uses different parts of your brain. Did you know that the Bible was written originally to be read aloud?
  3. Journaling: take the Bible in smaller chunks. Read a passage, reflect on it, and write down your reactions. Use a journaling Bible or a separate notebook. Focus on your personal feelings and reactions to the passage.
  4. Studying: this is where you break down what you’re reading verse-by-verse. Use multiple translations, a commentary, a Bible dictionary, etc., and get down into the nitty-gritty of the passage. What exactly does it mean? To you? To the original audience?

These four approaches are like a set of golf clubs: they’re all valuable, but you need to use the right club for the right job. For instance, if you decide to read through the Bible in a year, you should be using method #1. I don’t know how many times I’ve tried to study my way through the Bible in a year, and I always get burned out. It’s not because I don’t care about the Bible—it’s because studying is only meant for small chunks at a time, not the whole Bible. Ideally you would want to use both—“read” (#1) through the Bible and “study” (#4) through small passages. And then in Church or small group you would “listen” to the Bible (#2), and in your devotions you would “journal” (#3).

I know that seems like a lot. I’m not saying that you need to be doing all four methods all the time. What I’m saying is that all four of these methods can contribute to our understanding of the Bible, and we need to make sure we’re using them properly. So if you decide to read through the Bible, don’t try to use your putter (#4)—you’ll never make it! Instead, pull out your driver (#1) and take it in big chunks, without wading into the nitty-gritty. You’ll last a lot longer that way.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Massacre of the Innocents [By W.H. Auden]

[From For the Time Being,  by W.H. Auden] HEROD One needn’t be much of a psychologist to realize that if this rumor is not stamped out now, in a few years it is capable of diseasing the whole Empire, and one doesn’t have to be a prophet to predict the consequences if it should. Reason will be replaced by Revelation. Instead of Rational Law, objective truths perceptible to any who will undergo the necessary intellectual discipline, and the same for all, Knowledge will degenerate into a riot of subjective visions—feelings in the solar plexus induced by undernourishment, angelic images generated by fevers or drugs, dream warnings inspired by the sound of falling water. Whole cosmologies will be created out of some forgotten personal resentment, complete epics written in private languages, the daubs of school children ranked above the great masterpieces. Idealism will be replaced by Materialism. Priapus will only have to move to a good address and call himself Eros

Works of Love XVIII: “Love for the Dead”

[From Part II, Chapter IX: “ The Work of Love in Remembering One Dead ”] “Weep less bitterly for the dead, for he is at rest.” Sirach 22:11 (NRSV) [1] With chapter 9 of part 2, Works of Love is beginning to come to a close. With entry 17, this blog series is also nearing its end. As Kierkegaard has given us a detailed view of what Christian love is supposed to look like, now he gives us a way to test the purity of our own love: look at the way you love those who have died. [2] We are to love everyone, and loving means remembering, and so we are to love the dead. But loving those who have died is a special circumstance, and it shows us what kind of love we are showing. If we reflect on the way we love the dead, we can see whether we are showing truly Christian love. Kierkegaard identifies three ways that love for the dead is unique. First, he says that showing love for the dead is “a work of the most unselfish love.” He writes, “If one wants to make sure that love is

Choruses from the Rock (VI), By T.S. Eliot

[I know that I promised blog entries that I haven't delivered yet. I've got plenty of ideas in my head, it's just a matter of finding the time and the motivation at the same time. Anyway, I expect that I'll be ready to write relatively soon, but until then I thought I would tide you over with a section from T.S. Eliot's excellent poem, Choruses from "The Rock". Enjoy!] It is hard for those who have never known persecution, And who have never known a Christian, To believe these tales of Christian persecution. It is hard for those who live near a Bank To doubt the security of their money. It is hard for those who live near a Police Station To believe in the triumph of violence. Do you think that the Faith has conquered the World And that lions no longer need keepers? Do you need to be told that whatever has been, can still be? Do you need to be told that even such modest attainments As you boast of in the way of polite society Will hardly surv