Skip to main content

Works of Love XIX: “Learning Love”

[From Part II, Chapter X: “The Work of Love in Praising Love”]

“Anyone who does not love does not know God, because God is love…. In this is love, not that we have loved God but that he loved us and sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins.” 1 John 4:8, 10 (ESV)

Even as Works of Love draws to a close, there is still infinitely more that can be said about love. This one book is not enough to guide us completely in understanding the nature of Christian love. How, then, do we proceed when the book is over, the study is finished? How do we continue to pursue and understand love? Kierkegaard engages this question in a chapter on the importance of praising love—which we might (roughly) equate to “appreciating love.” Kierkegaard has two points to make about how we should appreciate love. We will cover the first one here, and the second on in the next post.
Kierkegaard’s first claim is that “the work of praising love must be done inwardly in self-renunciation [or self-denial].” He writes,
“Only in self-renunciation can one effectually praise love, for God is love, and only in self-renunciation can a human being hold fast God fast. What a human being of himself knows about love is very superficial; he must get to know the deeper love from God, that is, in self-denial he must become what every human being can become…, an instrument for God.”[1]
This is a very important concept for us to understand. Kierkegaard is saying that if we want to truly appreciate love for what it is, we must approach it in self-denial. What does this mean? We must accept that our knowledge of love is imperfect. I do not fully understand love. I may not even partially understand what love is truly supposed to look like. Only God, who is all-knowing and who is himself love, truly understands the nature of love.

Why is this so important? Because so often we set up our own definitions of what love is, and then we either mold God to fit that definition or we dismiss him as unloving. These days it is popular to define love as “giving a person what they want,” “validating their every opinion,” or “always seeking others’ happiness at any cost.” Many times, and in many ways, God has acted against that definition—both in scripture and in our own lives—and we decide that it wasn’t God who did such a thing, and if it was, then God isn’t good.

If we take the witness of scripture seriously, then we believe that God is love, and that we have an accurate record of his deeds among us. God was love when he sent his son to die on the cross. God was love when he sent an angel to kill the firstborn of Egypt. God was love when he delivered the Jews from the Amalekites. God was love when he ordered Joshua to wipe out the Canaanites, man, woman and child. Now, how we make sense of these tensions is by no means simple or easy, but we must wrestle with them nonetheless. The fact that Yahweh, the God of Israel, is love can never become an everyday fact. We should never become used to the fact that God is love and loves us. Kierkegaard writes,
“Therefore every human being can get to know everything about love, just as every human being can get to know that he is, as every human being is, loved by God. The difference is only that some consider (which does not seem so remarkable to me) this thought to be more than adequate even for the longest life, so that even in the seventieth year they do not think they have marveled over it enough; and others, however, consider (which seems to me very queer and reprehensible) this thought to be very insignificant, since to be loved by God is no more than what every man shares—as if it therefore were less significant.”[2]
It should always amaze us, overwhelm us, confuse us, and challenge us, this fact that God is love that he loves all. We should always be confounded by this fact because there is always more to learn about God and about love. When the God of love becomes passé, then we have ceased to learn from him. And then we have lost the point.

Dear Father,
I so often think that I have everything figured out. I so often expect you to conform to my understanding of love, feeble though it is. Put in my heart a hunger for knowledge of you. Make me unsatisfied with the platitudes and falsehoods that I do often embrace instead of your truth. Show me the true nature of love. Overcome my assumptions and preconceptions and show me your wonders, morning by morning.
In the name of Jesus Christ, who showed us your love on the cross,
Amen.




[1] Søren Kierkegaard, Works of Love. Harper Perennial, 2009, p. 334
[2] Ibid., 334-5.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Massacre of the Innocents [By W.H. Auden]

[From For the Time Being,  by W.H. Auden] HEROD One needn’t be much of a psychologist to realize that if this rumor is not stamped out now, in a few years it is capable of diseasing the whole Empire, and one doesn’t have to be a prophet to predict the consequences if it should. Reason will be replaced by Revelation. Instead of Rational Law, objective truths perceptible to any who will undergo the necessary intellectual discipline, and the same for all, Knowledge will degenerate into a riot of subjective visions—feelings in the solar plexus induced by undernourishment, angelic images generated by fevers or drugs, dream warnings inspired by the sound of falling water. Whole cosmologies will be created out of some forgotten personal resentment, complete epics written in private languages, the daubs of school children ranked above the great masterpieces. Idealism will be replaced by Materialism. Priapus will only have to move to a good address and call himself Eros
Post a Comment
Read more

Works of Love XVIII: “Love for the Dead”

[From Part II, Chapter IX: “ The Work of Love in Remembering One Dead ”] “Weep less bitterly for the dead, for he is at rest.” Sirach 22:11 (NRSV) [1] With chapter 9 of part 2, Works of Love is beginning to come to a close. With entry 17, this blog series is also nearing its end. As Kierkegaard has given us a detailed view of what Christian love is supposed to look like, now he gives us a way to test the purity of our own love: look at the way you love those who have died. [2] We are to love everyone, and loving means remembering, and so we are to love the dead. But loving those who have died is a special circumstance, and it shows us what kind of love we are showing. If we reflect on the way we love the dead, we can see whether we are showing truly Christian love. Kierkegaard identifies three ways that love for the dead is unique. First, he says that showing love for the dead is “a work of the most unselfish love.” He writes, “If one wants to make sure that love is
Post a Comment
Read more

Choruses from the Rock (VI), By T.S. Eliot

[I know that I promised blog entries that I haven't delivered yet. I've got plenty of ideas in my head, it's just a matter of finding the time and the motivation at the same time. Anyway, I expect that I'll be ready to write relatively soon, but until then I thought I would tide you over with a section from T.S. Eliot's excellent poem, Choruses from "The Rock". Enjoy!] It is hard for those who have never known persecution, And who have never known a Christian, To believe these tales of Christian persecution. It is hard for those who live near a Bank To doubt the security of their money. It is hard for those who live near a Police Station To believe in the triumph of violence. Do you think that the Faith has conquered the World And that lions no longer need keepers? Do you need to be told that whatever has been, can still be? Do you need to be told that even such modest attainments As you boast of in the way of polite society Will hardly surv
Post a Comment
Read more