Skip to main content

Has Christianity Made the World Better?


It is one of the great tragedies of our time that Christians are taught to be ashamed of our past. Anyone who has taken a course in Western history in the last seventy years is undoubtedly aware of the long list of atrocities that are laid at the feet of Christianity, while the list of its victories is short (if it exists at all). Evangelicals have tried to deflect this phenomenon by pointing the finger at certain denominations (mainly Catholicism) or at Denominationalism in general—a maneuver that is neither fair, accurate, nor true—but have largely failed to avoid condemnation. We all drown beneath the onslaught of historical crimes: crusades, witch-burnings, subjugation of native peoples, human slavery, the list goes on. Of course, no one points out the hypocrisy of these accusations (For instance, on what basis can the secular world tell us that killing in the name of God is barbaric—which it is—while killing in the name of a government is perfectly moral?), nor do they acknowledge their inaccuracies (witch-burnings, subjugation, and slavery occurred almost exclusively in times and places that the Church had lost its former political power). All we are told is that the Christian past is shameful, and we must either change our faith or abandon it.

I am not going to argue that there is no shame in our past—after all, regardless of how Christianity may or may not have contributed to the atrocities I have mentioned, the mere fact that they happened at all in a society in which Christianity had so much influence is shameful. The problem is not that we feel guilty about the bad things that have happened, but that we are largely ignorant of how Christianity has fundamentally changed our world for the better. We are so ignorant of this fact that it has affected our theology; nowadays we consider the Kingdom of Heaven to be located almost exclusively in the end of time because we cannot see the true impact of Christ on the whole fabric of our world. It’s reached the point where most of us would have a hard time justifying the claim that Christianity has made the world better; we essentially deny the power of the Gospel by accepting that Christianity will not make the world better until Jesus returns. It is true, only the second coming will make our world perfect, but it is simply not true to say that Christianity has not improved the world we live in to a dramatic degree.

The problem is that Christianity has been a part of Western society for so long that we can no longer tell how much of who we are came from the influence of Jesus Christ. So many things we take for granted, even the secular world, are actually a result of the influence of the Gospel. We must start, then, by looking at what the world was like before it was revolutionized by the Gospel, so that we can see just how revolutionary it was.

Good and Evil in the Pagan World

Just so that I won’t appear biased, I am going to use a non-Christian source to describe what morality looked like in the Pagan world. Friedrich Nietzsche was a virulent anti-Christian atheist; he hated Christianity for the way it had, in his view, corrupted the morality of the world. Nietzsche describes Pagan morality this way:
The man could grow a mustache...
What is good? – All that heightens the feeling of power, the will to power, power itself in man. What is bad? – All that proceeds from weakness. What is happiness? – The feeling that power increases – that a resistance is overcome.[1]
In the Pagan world, power was considered good. It is good to be the most powerful, the strongest, the most popular, the winner. It was bad to be powerless, weak, unpopular, a loser. The word for this kind of morality is nobility: the nobles represent all that is good and virtuous, while the peasants represented all that was base and evil and unworthy. This assumption was so deeply held in the pagan world that Roman judges would not allow slaves to testify in court unless they had been tortured first, as a matter of course, because slaves simply could not be trusted.

You can see the difference in this culture by looking at the heroes of the Ancient world: look at the heroes of The Iliad and The Odyssey, all noble men performing valiant deeds. These heroes are drastically different from the main characters of the Gospel, all common men and all (with one exception) deeply flawed. Most Pagans, in fact, would have been confused by the Gospels. Take, for instance, the story of Peter denying Christ. These days we see Peter as a tragic character; we sympathize with him when he weeps over betraying Jesus. This would not have made sense to the Pagans. After all, as David Bentley Hart points out,
Peter, as a rustic, could not possibly have been a worthy object of a well-bred man's sympathy, nor could his grief possibly have possessed the sort of tragic dignity necessary to make it worthy of anyone's notice.[2]
The Pagan world, by and large, did not care about the poor, the weak, the sick, the suffering, etc. Those people were failures, unworthy, worthless, useless, certainly not worthy of the concern of the nobles. This is the morality of the world.

Good and Evil in the Kingdom

The roots of Christian morality go back to the Old Testament, but they really begin when a man stood on a hilltop in Judea and told his followers,
Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. Blessed are those who mourn… Blessed are the meek… Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness… Blessed are the merciful… the pure in heart… the peacemakers…. Blessed are those who are persecuted for righteousness' sake, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.” (Matthew 5:3-10, ESV)
The Sermon on the Mount was nothing short of a revolution, a declaration of war on the world’s values. Jesus’ beatitudes turned morality on its head: bad became good and good became evil. We have a hard time understanding just how amazing the message of Christ was at that time, but at the time it was beyond radical, and the world had never seen anything like it. This is why the Romans reacted so harshly against Christianity: because it violated everything they stood for. To the Romans, Christianity was evil. Hart describes the reaction of one of their leaders:
In his treatise Against the Galilaeans, Julian complained that the Christians had from the earliest days swelled their ranks with the most vicious, disreputable, and contemptible of persons, while offering only baptism as a remedy for their vileness, as if mere water could cleanse the soul.[3]
Understand, these critics were not mistaken. By their standards, the churches were filled with the absolute worst kind of filth: the poor, slaves, women, etc., people about whom the pagan world did not care. The Church took in losers of every kind and told them they were valuable—and that was a message the Romans could not abide.

The Impact of the Gospel

Perhaps now you can begin to see the scope of how Christianity has changed society: it is only because of the Gospel that people today care about the oppressed. When Jesus taught his Sermon on the Mount, he began a movement that is responsible for the invention of hospitals, orphanages, almshouses, hostels; the movement that made charity and compassion into virtues; the movement that inspired abolitionism and the Civil Rights movement. Even morally-neutral ideas like democracy sprang from the idea that the powerless deserve a voice. All of this is a result of the message of the Kingdom of Heaven.

Now, let me be very clear: this is not the extent of the Kingdom of Heaven. Jesus came to do more than change our social values: he came to redeem sinners and transform lives, and that is the ultimate power of the Gospel. You see, the secular world can hold onto values like charity and compassion because they learned them from the Church; but in the world’s hands those values are misunderstood and misused. What the world cannot offer us is a reason for being charitable and compassionate, which is why the world is so bad at following through on them.

As Christians we know the reason: we know that Jesus Christ founded a new kingdom when he was raised from the dead. We know that Jesus redeemed us of our sins and sanctified us so that we can truly love each other and care about even the weakest of people. The world justifies its values by pointing inward at itself: we care about the poor and weak because I am entitled to it as a human being with rights. Even when the world tries to be charitable, it turns into selfishness. The Church justifies its values by pointing up to the risen Christ, who showed love for the lowest of people by dying on the Cross. We love others because Christ has taught us that every human being has value, no matter whether the world calls us worthless.

So we return to the question: has Christianity made the world better? The answer is, Yes, by the grace of God and the power of Christ. It is only because of him that we care about the poor and the outcast. Before Christ, and without him, our values are entirely selfish and abusive. And on that basis we offer the world a choice: where do you want to live? In a world that values power, that glorifies the wealthy and popular simply because they are wealthy and popular? Or in the Kingdom of Heaven, where each person has true value, not because they are entitled to it, but because they are a cherished creation of a loving God? And that Kingdom, which gives every person value, which has totally revolutionized (if not yet perfected) society, is a history we can be proud of.  

Let me leave you with this quote, which I find to be an encouraging reminder of how we can see the impact of Christ in everyday situations that we take for granted. The Kingdom is all around us, affecting us in ways we don't always recognize:
“An ordinary street scene, such as an ambulance stopping all traffic because one wounded man must be transported, is the result of the coming of the Kingdom.”[4]




[1] (Friedrich Nietzsche, The Anti-Christ)
[2] (David Bentley Hart, Atheist Delusions: The Christian Revolution and Its Fashionable Enemies)
[3] (David Bentley Hart, Atheist Delusions: The Christian Revolution and Its Fashionable Enemies)
[4] (Hendrikus Berkhof, Christ the Meaning of History)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Massacre of the Innocents [By W.H. Auden]

[From For the Time Being,  by W.H. Auden] HEROD One needn’t be much of a psychologist to realize that if this rumor is not stamped out now, in a few years it is capable of diseasing the whole Empire, and one doesn’t have to be a prophet to predict the consequences if it should. Reason will be replaced by Revelation. Instead of Rational Law, objective truths perceptible to any who will undergo the necessary intellectual discipline, and the same for all, Knowledge will degenerate into a riot of subjective visions—feelings in the solar plexus induced by undernourishment, angelic images generated by fevers or drugs, dream warnings inspired by the sound of falling water. Whole cosmologies will be created out of some forgotten personal resentment, complete epics written in private languages, the daubs of school children ranked above the great masterpieces. Idealism will be replaced by Materialism. Priapus will only have to move to a good address and call himself Eros

Works of Love XVIII: “Love for the Dead”

[From Part II, Chapter IX: “ The Work of Love in Remembering One Dead ”] “Weep less bitterly for the dead, for he is at rest.” Sirach 22:11 (NRSV) [1] With chapter 9 of part 2, Works of Love is beginning to come to a close. With entry 17, this blog series is also nearing its end. As Kierkegaard has given us a detailed view of what Christian love is supposed to look like, now he gives us a way to test the purity of our own love: look at the way you love those who have died. [2] We are to love everyone, and loving means remembering, and so we are to love the dead. But loving those who have died is a special circumstance, and it shows us what kind of love we are showing. If we reflect on the way we love the dead, we can see whether we are showing truly Christian love. Kierkegaard identifies three ways that love for the dead is unique. First, he says that showing love for the dead is “a work of the most unselfish love.” He writes, “If one wants to make sure that love is

Choruses from the Rock (VI), By T.S. Eliot

[I know that I promised blog entries that I haven't delivered yet. I've got plenty of ideas in my head, it's just a matter of finding the time and the motivation at the same time. Anyway, I expect that I'll be ready to write relatively soon, but until then I thought I would tide you over with a section from T.S. Eliot's excellent poem, Choruses from "The Rock". Enjoy!] It is hard for those who have never known persecution, And who have never known a Christian, To believe these tales of Christian persecution. It is hard for those who live near a Bank To doubt the security of their money. It is hard for those who live near a Police Station To believe in the triumph of violence. Do you think that the Faith has conquered the World And that lions no longer need keepers? Do you need to be told that whatever has been, can still be? Do you need to be told that even such modest attainments As you boast of in the way of polite society Will hardly surv