Skip to main content

A Fragment on the Nature of Evil

[I've been remiss in my posting over the last two weeks because my schedule kind of got unraveled. I'm hoping to catch up this week, but I thought I would start posting some of my shorter, more concise thoughts as a way to get myself posting and and hopefully get some feed back.]


When something bad happens, people often comfort each other by saying that the event in question was part of a "higher purpose." They explain evil things as necessary parts of God's plan to bring about the "greater good." This answer is not only unhelpful, but it is also unbiblical and it takes away from the glory of God. The fact that God uses evil to accomplish good is not an explanation of the presence of evil; rather, it is a miracle that itself defies explanation.

Comments

  1. jim-gNovember 1, 2011 at 5:17 PM

    So, you say that because you lack the reason of why evil exists makes an extraordinary event manifesting divine intervention in human affairs. Then isn't all action by God a miracle!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Matt HolmesNovember 1, 2011 at 8:57 PM

    Hmm... well, no, I don't think that all action by God is a miracle. In fact, I think that 99% of what God does is not miraculous--it is an act of God's power that the Sun continues to burn, that the Earth continues to spin, that the atoms in my hand continue to hold together.

    What I mean here is that we shouldn't attribute evil events to necessary acts of God's plan, as if God committed a little evil to achieve the greater good. God doesn't commit evil, and evil doesn't happen because God wants it to. Evil happens because we have brought evil into the world and must all live with the consequences; in spite of this, God can use these evil events to accomplish great things. The fact that God works all things together for the good of those who serve him should not be a natural occurrence to us, as if it can explain the existence of evil; rather, it should be a miracle and a mystery to us, something that we recognize as outside our understanding but believe in through faith nonetheless.

    ReplyDelete
  3. jim-gNovember 5, 2011 at 9:23 AM

    It is a bit a stretch for me that you consider God's ability to intervene a miracle since HE has ultimate control e.g. sun, moon and stars. Wouldn't it be a bit less of a stretch to wonder why God allows it to play out in this fashion?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Massacre of the Innocents [By W.H. Auden]

[From For the Time Being,  by W.H. Auden] HEROD One needn’t be much of a psychologist to realize that if this rumor is not stamped out now, in a few years it is capable of diseasing the whole Empire, and one doesn’t have to be a prophet to predict the consequences if it should. Reason will be replaced by Revelation. Instead of Rational Law, objective truths perceptible to any who will undergo the necessary intellectual discipline, and the same for all, Knowledge will degenerate into a riot of subjective visions—feelings in the solar plexus induced by undernourishment, angelic images generated by fevers or drugs, dream warnings inspired by the sound of falling water. Whole cosmologies will be created out of some forgotten personal resentment, complete epics written in private languages, the daubs of school children ranked above the great masterpieces. Idealism will be replaced by Materialism. Priapus will only have to move to a good address and call himself Eros
Post a Comment
Read more

Works of Love XVIII: “Love for the Dead”

[From Part II, Chapter IX: “ The Work of Love in Remembering One Dead ”] “Weep less bitterly for the dead, for he is at rest.” Sirach 22:11 (NRSV) [1] With chapter 9 of part 2, Works of Love is beginning to come to a close. With entry 17, this blog series is also nearing its end. As Kierkegaard has given us a detailed view of what Christian love is supposed to look like, now he gives us a way to test the purity of our own love: look at the way you love those who have died. [2] We are to love everyone, and loving means remembering, and so we are to love the dead. But loving those who have died is a special circumstance, and it shows us what kind of love we are showing. If we reflect on the way we love the dead, we can see whether we are showing truly Christian love. Kierkegaard identifies three ways that love for the dead is unique. First, he says that showing love for the dead is “a work of the most unselfish love.” He writes, “If one wants to make sure that love is
Post a Comment
Read more

Choruses from the Rock (VI), By T.S. Eliot

[I know that I promised blog entries that I haven't delivered yet. I've got plenty of ideas in my head, it's just a matter of finding the time and the motivation at the same time. Anyway, I expect that I'll be ready to write relatively soon, but until then I thought I would tide you over with a section from T.S. Eliot's excellent poem, Choruses from "The Rock". Enjoy!] It is hard for those who have never known persecution, And who have never known a Christian, To believe these tales of Christian persecution. It is hard for those who live near a Bank To doubt the security of their money. It is hard for those who live near a Police Station To believe in the triumph of violence. Do you think that the Faith has conquered the World And that lions no longer need keepers? Do you need to be told that whatever has been, can still be? Do you need to be told that even such modest attainments As you boast of in the way of polite society Will hardly surv
Post a Comment
Read more